Sunday, October 30, 2016

CAFTAN WOMAN'S CHOICE: ONE FOR NOVEMBER ON TCM



"The first version of The Man Who Knew Too Much was the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional." 
- Alfred Hitchcock to Francois Truffaut


Well, Heaven bless the talented amateur!  While I find much to enjoy and admire in the 1956 version, it is the 1934 version that has retained a hold on this movie fan's imagination for many years.

Winter in the Swiss Alps shows the smart set participating in a sporting tournament.  The Lawrence family, father (Leslie Banks), Jill (Edna Best) and daughter Betty (Nova Pilbeam) are enjoying the fresh air, fun company and Jill's chances for a trophy in the shooting.  The rambunctious Betty inadvertently help put an end to her mother's chances, but a rematch with rival Ramon (Frank Vosper) is spoken of and is most definitely in the cards.  Betty's antics also ruined chances for a charming skiing friend Louis (Pierre Fresnay).  He doesn't seem to mind much.  Perhaps he has other things on his mind.  Other things beyond his mock flirting with Jill to create mock sorrow in Lawrence.

Louis is really an agent for the British Secret Service with vital information on a planned assassination.  He is shot before he can reveal the secret, but before dying brings Jill and Lawrence in on the deal.  Foolhardily, they rush into the intrigue, but before they can relay the information, the villains kidnap Betty leaving the Lawrences in a bind.

"Say nothing of what you have found or you will never see your child again."



Edna Best

Back in England, the Secret Service is monitoring the situation despite the Lawrences following instructions not to speak to the authorities.  Lawrence and his friend Clive (Frank Wakefield) head out into the night and the neighbourhood of Wapping in East London.  The only clue they have is the information left from Louis:

WAPPING
G. BARBOR  MAKE
CONTACT  A. HALL
MARCH 21st

No points for recognizing that A. HALL stands for the Albert Hall.  The assassination scenes in both movies are equally thrilling with the Storm Clouds Cantata by Arthur Benjamin and D.B. Wyndham-Lewis providing a natural and exciting soundtrack to the emotional action.



Peter Lorre, Leslie Banks, Nova Pilbeam

Peter Lorre is the boss of the anarchist group, Abbott.  It was his first English language picture and much of his dialogue was learned phonetically.  However, that is not the impression you will get from watching the actor.  The character is a leader, a sly villain and a sentimentalist.  All of that is conveyed by Lorre's handling of the role.

If you have only seen Leslie Banks as the mad Zaroff in The Most Dangerous Game, you owe it to yourself to see Banks as Lawrence in The Man Who Knew Too Much.  He is given much of the grand dry wit that threads through the script making the movie such a pleasure to watch.  Thank of it as Wodehouse with the dramatic bits put in.

Watching the 1934 film you can definitely see why Hitchcock would want to revisit the story, expand the family life, create that light-filled setting for the unseen danger.  The 1956 version is a commendable film indeed.  However, there is something about the brisk pace, the quick editing and, as mentioned, the use of humour that makes the 1934 film, at 75 minutes, a prime example of superb directing and a perfect entertainment.

TCM is screening The Man Who Knew Too Much on Thursday, November 3rd at 2:45 p.m. following Jamaica Inn, another Hitchcock flick featuring Leslie Banks.  No, it isn't his birthday.  If you miss it, TCM gives you another chance on Tuesday, November 29th at 7:15 a.m. in a day dedicated to Hitch.






18 comments:

  1. You're going to disown me as a blogging associate when I tell you I own this film and have never seen it! Well, I've got to change that right away. I quite like the 1956 film, but you've completely sold me on the earlier version. I think I'll love it for all the reasons you mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Omigosh! You don't even have to wait for TCM. You can just sit down and watch it any time. If I'm not getting ahead of myself, welcome to the fan club.

      Delete
  2. I love three things in this version: Peter Lorre (bonus points for his possum hair), the epic chair fight and Edna Best's badass character. Great choice!
    Kisses!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pat I think I've actually seen this a couple of times, but you know my old lady memory. I only vaguely remember some skiing scenes and snow and Peter Lorre. I'm going to try and watch it again. Maybe it will show up on the new TCM streaming service.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bet they will stream this one. It's a dandy!

      I know what you mean about the old lady memory. There are some movies where I only remember the furniture!

      Delete
  4. I'm a huge fan of Jimmy Stewart - but have to admit the '34 film is also my favorite. Maybe it's because the '56 version has too much of the director's stamp. It is so polished, that it never quite feels real. The '34 version somehow always pulls me more into it's emotion and sense of desperation. Never realized 'till now that this is the same Leslie Banks who played Count Zaroff - shame on me! He is excellent in both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You've pointed out something key. The polish of the later version rather keeps us at arm's length, while the swiftness of the action makes us feel everything happening in the earlier one.

      Leslie Banks appeared in a number of Broadway comedies and a musical version of "Lost in the Stars". We get to enjoy his movie work, but what a treat he must have been on stage.

      Delete
  5. At first, I couldn't understand why that dude in the screen cap had a white streak in his hair. Then I saw it was Peter Lorre and it made much more sense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds really good. I don't know why I kept passing it up before, but I did. Thanks for highlighting it, CW!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome. It's a dandy, and doesn't take up much of your time. I don't think today's filmmakers realize what a boon that is.

      Delete
  7. It's really a great and useful piece of info. I'm satisfied that you just shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing. 한국야동

    Also feel free to visit may web page 야한동영상

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for your kindness by providing valuable information to us. It really helped me to enhance my knowledge and skills 야설

    Also feel free to visit may web page 한국야동

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow! This can be one particular of the most useful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject 야동

    Also feel free to visit may web page 일본야동

    ReplyDelete
  10. I need to to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have got you bookmarked to check out new things you post 국산야동

    Also feel free to visit may web page 야설

    ReplyDelete
  11. It very well may be very unpleasant to make the fundamental groundwork for the large day. There are so numerous things that can turn out badly. You may end up tracking down a couple of wrinkles or pimples preceding the huge day. This is unquestionably something which you would prefer not to see. 한국야동

    Also feel free to visit may web page 야설

    ReplyDelete

THE UMPTEENTH BLOGATION: 42nd Street, 1933

Theresa, the CineMaven herself is hosting The Umpteenth Blogathon on January 18th. A tribute to those movies which have an addictive hold ...